Showing posts with label reconciliation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label reconciliation. Show all posts

Monday, March 22, 2010

So Health Care Reform Is Here: What's in It for Us?

So most of the health care reform package has passed, and we're just waiting for the Senate to pass the reconciliation fixes this week. So what's in it for us? Quite a bit, in fact. Here's a rundown from Crooks & Liars on which reforms take place starting this year.

Adult children may remain as dependents on their parents’ policy until their 27th birthday

Children under age 19 may not be excluded for pre-existing conditions

No more lifetime or annual caps on coverage

Free preventative care for all

Adults with pre-existing conditions may buy into a national high-risk pool until the exchanges come online.

While these will not be cheap, they’re still better than total exclusion and get some benefit from a wider pool of insureds.

Small businesses will be entitled to a tax credit for 2009 and 2010, which could be as much as 50% of what they pay for employees’ health insurance.

The “donut hole” closes for Medicare patients, making prescription medications more affordable for seniors.

Requirement that all insurers must post their balance sheets on the Internet and fully disclose administrative costs, executive compensation packages, and benefit payments.

Authorizes early funding of community health centers in all 50 states (Bernie Sanders’ amendment). Community health centers provide primary, dental and vision services to people in the community, based on a sliding scale for payment according to ability to pay.

AND no more rescissions. Effective immediately, you can't lose your insurance because you get sick.

All of these are quite important, and some will really come into use this year as they come online. I'm especially excited about the community health clinics.

Now all the other big changes, including the creation of the insurance exchange, the individual mandate, the employer mandate, and the affordability tax credits, will come online starting in 2014.

But what happens in the mean time? And what if Republicans are serious about their threats to repeal health care reform? No matter how serious they are, it's not very likely.

Conservatives have been hinting at a campaign to repeal the newly-passed bill for weeks. But actually having to run one is their worst nightmare. They never wanted to get to this point. They know that repealing the legislation will be far more difficult than passing it was, and by now, Americans fully realize how arduous the journey to last night was. At this point, repeal is fantasy.

For starters, Republicans simply don’t have the numbers in either chamber. It’s doubtful that even Democrats who voted with them last night, would support a repeal of their President’s signature achievement. Pelosi may have allowed a few members in difficult districts to sit this one out, but she certainly wouldn’t allow them to actively undermine her. Moreover, Republicans are far short of the requisite 60 votes in the Senate. And besides, its become abundantly clear over the past year that having the votes in the Senate is a very different proposition than having the party unity to exercise them.

More significant though is the political difficulty of arguing against the benefits of the bill, especially the ones that kick in early. Republicans will have to tell people with pre-existing conditions that their new ability to access coverage will be withdrawn. They’ll have to tell young people and their parents that young folks won’t be able to stay on the family plan. They’ll have to tell Americans that they’re fighting to allow insurance companies to drop sick people from their rolls once more. Those aren’t easy fights to have. Health care reform was much easier to dog before it actually becomes law. [Emphasis mine.]

Of course Republicans can argue that they’d repeal the package but reinstate certain popular provisions, but Democrats have two easy rejoinders. First, the country can’t afford to force insurers to keep people on their rolls without also expanding the entire pool of insured people. And without the cost cutting measures, the bill is just a spending bill. Second, after years of controlling Congress and not acting on health care, Republican’s [sic] don’t have a lot of credibility on the issue.

Need I say more? They had their chance to do something, but Republicans preferred to do nothing. So I doubt voters will trust them this time when they make empty promises to "start over" after they "kill the bill" that's now becoming law.

So most likely, the Senate will soon pass the reconciliation fix this week and the whole health care reform package should become law by the end of the month. Some benefits, like the exchange, will have to wait until 2014. Meanwhile, other benefits, like the community health centers, will be seen as early as this fall. And while this final package isn't perfect (we've talked about this extensively), it looks to withstand Republican attacks and start working for those who need help the most.

Sunday, March 21, 2010

BREAKING: HR 4872 HCR Reconciliation Fix Passes!

The vote is 217-205 right now, so we know it will pass. This is the reconciliation package that the House will send to the Senate. It nixes the "pork giveaways" in the Senate bill while strengthening some insurance regulations and increasing subsidies to help working families afford health insurance.

The final vote is 220-211. The bill is passed!

It's all up to our Harry Reid now to get the job done. I know he will. :-)

BREAKING: House Votes to Approve HCR Rules 224-206!

And it passes! OK, not yet... This was just over the rules to be set for the rest of the day's health care reform votes. However, this is a key test vote that shows Democrats DO have the votes to pass the final health care reform bills (the Senate bill and the reconciliation fix to the Senate bill) pass.

The vote was 224 in favor to 206 against. 28 ConservaDems voted against.

HCR Voting Starts NOW!

Follow me at Twitter @atdleft and/or Facebook for updates. I'll post more here as we find out who votes which way.

Saturday, March 20, 2010

BREAKING: "Deem & Pass" Dropped, but Health Care Bills Still on Track for Tomorrow

OK, so that's not happening. So are we in trouble? Not exactly.

Now, they'll just have to hold three separate but interdependent votes tomorrow:

1. to set the terms of debate (how much time, how many [if any] amendments allowed, etc.)

2. on the reconciliation "sidecar" bill including all the House-approved fixes to the Senate bill

3. on the Senate bill that will be fixed by the above sidecar bill if both pass

And apparently, House Democratic leadership is confident that all the "Yes" votes they've collected so far will stay put and vote in the affirmative for all three, while this new plan to help win over the last remaining undecided Dems who were afraid of "deem & pass" (despite the Republicans constantly using this when they were in power).

Friday, March 19, 2010

BREAKING: Dina Titus Will Vote FOR Health Care Reform!

Thank you, Dina!

“For nearly a year, I have talked with the people of District Three about the need for health care reform,” Titus said. “I have heard horror stories from small business owners who had to lay off workers because of rising health care costs and families that could not get insurance because of a pre-existing condition. While the legislation the House will vote on this weekend is not perfect, it makes critical reforms that provide common sense rules of the road that will give families and small businesses more control over their health care – not government bureaucrats or insurance company CEOs.”

“From the beginning, I have said I support legislation that reduces costs, strengthens Medicare, and increases choice,” Titus continued. “This legislation meets those goals, and where flaws still exist, I will continue to push for additional reforms. This bill will make real progress by preventing insurance companies from denying coverage for pre-existing conditions, closing the donut hole for prescription drugs, and giving families and small businesses the largest health care tax break in history.”

Titus had expressed concern about the Senate health care bill and wanted to see key changes to the legislation to benefit the Third District. The changes that have been included in the bill are closing the donut hole, removing special deals for certain states, changing the “Cadillac tax” so that it goes into effect later and has a higher threshold, and stronger consumer protections against discrimination for pre-existing conditions.

“During this process, the people of District Three have seen a barrage of ads paid for by special-interest money from insurance companies and those that benefit from the status quo,” said Titus. “I have always made my decisions based on what I believe is in the best interests of the people of District Three; and even in the face of more than $1 million of special-interest ads, this time is no different.”

Often when members of Congress are elected and make the sojourn to DC, they sometimes forget who sent them there in the first place. They sometimes forget who they're supposed to be working for. I'm glad that Dina Titus hasn't forgotten who's she working for.

I'm glad Dina hasn't forgotten who sent her to Washington. We the people did, NOT the HMOs, PhRMA, and the Chamber of Commerce! They may throw money into trashy ads attacking her for this, but we the people know why Dina is doing this and we will reward her accordingly.

So thank you, Dina! Those of us who actually live in the district and don't need insurance company talking points to speak will stand with you and make sure you're reelected this year so you can keep fighting for Southern Nevada's working families.

Thursday, March 11, 2010

Health Care: Durbin Whipping AGAINST Public Option? And Reid's Voting FOR It?

Whoa, there! Just as we're all starting to feel better again about health care reform getting done, this happens.

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) told Greg Sargent today he'd be willing to introduce the public option amendment. But if Durbin's comments are any indication, it won't get very far.

"We have to move this forward. We know the Republicans are likely to offer a lot of amendments, and some of them may be appealing to Democrats, but we have to urge them to stick with the bill," he said.

That's upsetting to the Progressive Change Campaign Committee, which is pushing senators to publicly support using reconciliation for a public option. Adam Green, the founder of the PCCC, tells TPMDC he's about to launch an offensive against Durbin.

"We're going to make it radioactive for him to whip against the public option," he said. The PCCC will target Durbin with web videos. It will also, Green said, blast emails to its supporters -- specifically the ones whose senators have signed on to the push -- asking them to write to their senators and demand they stand their ground.

So Sanders proposes introducing a public option amendment to the reconciliation bill, and Durbin (who was supposedly for the public option) proposes whipping Democrats against it... Even though Sanders and 40 other Democratic Senators (including Harry Reid!) have all said they're ready to vote for the public option in reconciliation.

So what are we to think? And what are we to do?

I called Harry Reid's office. All the lines at his DC office were full, so I then called the Las Vegas office. Someone answered, and I asked if Reid is changing his tune on the public option.

The staffer told me that Harry Reid supports the public option and will vote for it if the public option amendment gets a vote in reconciliation. Wait... HUH??!! So Durbin is moving to the right of Reid on the public option?

Maybe, or maybe there are some inside games happening. Perhaps Dick Durbin's just floating this as a possibility, or perhaps Harry Reid knows that he needs to stick with the public option to keep the Democratic base here in Nevada on board with him. Whatever is actually happening, we need to kill this talk of killing the public option.

And whatever else you do today, please call Harry Reid's Las Vegas office at 702-388-5020 NOW to thank him for moving health care reform forward and supporting the public option, and ask him not to give up on either! It's urgent that we pass health care reform and pass the best package possible. And since we all know that the best package possible includes a public option, we shouldn't give up on it just yet. Let's also make sure Harry Reid doesn't give up.

Tuesday, March 9, 2010

Health Care: What's Next

ABC News posted a good story today explaining how reconciliation can be used to pass the health care reform package, and how Republicans are limited in their attempts to stall the process. It's really a good read.

Meanwhile, the supposedly "dreaded" polling on health care isn't actually looking so bad these days. I usually don't read much Andrew Sullivan (he can be too "insider gossip-y" for me at times), but I actually appreciate his insight (IMHO correct this time) on how the public is slowly, but surely, waking up to the reality of health care and realizing that we need to get reform done soon to rein in costs, get more people covered, and make the system work better for everyone overall.

Now Desert Beacon talked today about AHIP (the insurance industry lobbying group) launching a $1 million final campaign to destroy health care reform this year. As usual, they're peddling the same ol' lies and bullsh*t that we've become accustomed to lately. Basically, it will be more of the "I-hate-big-government-so-leave-my-big-government-benefits-alone" autotune that Suzy Lowdown thought would work so well here...

But Democrats are (FINALLY!) showing some spine and are starting to fight back. Here in Nevada, Harry Reid's campaign continues hammering at Suzy's lying teevee ad and they're actually getting some traction on this as the media, both local and national, are debunking her ridiculous claims.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy


(I tried to get an embed code for "Face to Face", but I guess The Sun & KVBC-3 aren't allowing that any more... So you'll have to go there yourself to watch it. Sorry.)

Oh, and it gets better...



This is an example of the new Americans United for Change plan to hit supposedly "moderate" Republicans who are taking a hard line against reform. Good. Don't let them get away with the "moderate" crap any more if they won't even try to play ball on health care. I'd really like to see something like this hit Suzy Lowdown, since she's the same kind of hypocrite as Johnny Mac.

So what's next? Apparently, a real chance to finally get health care reform done. FINALLY!

Tuesday, March 2, 2010

NV-Sen, Health Care: Suzy Lowdown Goes Autotune on Us

OMG, Suzy Lowdown is back with a new ad!



And as usual, it's filled with a bunch of myths, mistruths, word-twists, and flat-out lies. Hell, just read Desert Beacon's well-researched blog to get the facts! Media Matters has also studied all the same myths that Suzy's trying to shove down our throats, and have found them to be just that: completely false myths!

OK, so you don't feel like reading all the wonky goodness I just provided in the above links? Well, then just sit back and enjoy these vids I pulled up just for you!





What? You thought I'd just link to Harry Reid's myth debunker page and call it a day? Oh no, my kids! I love to treat you with plenty of wonky policy goodness! And unlike Suzy Lowdown, neither Harry nor I need to revert to "same ol' soundbite autotune" to make a point.

Friday, February 19, 2010

BREAKING: Harry Reid Signals Support for HCR Reconciliation Vote on Public Option!

SCORE!

In another surprising step forward for the public option, Senator Harry Reid’s office says that if a final decision is made to pass health reform via reconciliation, the Majority Leader would support holding a reconciliation vote on the public option.

With more and more Senators signing on to the letter urging Reid to hold an up or down vote on the public option under reconciliation rules, Reid spokesman Rodell Mollineau sends over a statement signaling Reid’s qualified support for the move:

"Senator Reid has always and continues to support the public option as a way to drive down costs and create competition. That is why he included the measure in his original health care proposal.

"If a decision is made to use reconciliation to advance health care, Senator Reid will work with the White House, the House, and members of his caucus in an effort to craft a public option that can overcome procedural obstacles and secure enough votes."

This is BIG news. Until now, Reid has been hesitant (and understandably so) about using reconciliation on health care. It's complicated, difficult, and very time-consuming. But with Republicans unwilling to agree to even a final vote on health care reform and an increasing number of progressive Democrats unwilling (and rightfully so) to sacrifice their principles for just any bill, this is the only realistic possibility left to pass the bill.

So now, Senate parliamentarians and Senate Democratic leaders will have to figure out how to properly use reconciliation to get health care done. And in the mean time, House Democratic leaders will have to ensure they still have at least 218 confirmed votes for both the Senate bill and the new reconciliation "fix" to the Senate bill while President Obama helps round up support in both houses of Congress and among the American people.

Let's hope they all make it happen soon!

Thursday, February 18, 2010

Health Care: Surprise! Most Nevadans Aren't Afraid of "The R Word".

So why should Harry Reid? Take a look at these brand new Research 2000 poll numbers... And if you have a chance to see President Obama and Senator Reid tomorrow, tell them that they don't need to be afraid to do the right thing. Apparently, we "get it" and we'll support them on finishing health care reform and getting it done right.


QUESTION: Would you favor or oppose the national government offering everyone the choice of buying into a government administered health insurance plan – something like the Medicare coverage that people 65 and older get – that would compete with private health insurance plans?
FAVOROPPOSENOT SURE
ALL56%38%6%
MEN52%43%5%
WOMEN60%33%7%
DEMOCRATS88%10%2%
REPUBLICANS18%71%11%
INDEPENDENTS61%35%4%
WHITE50%44%6%
LATINO74%17%9%
BLACK83%11%6%
OBAMA VOTERS75%13%12%
DISTRICT 164%32%4%
DISTRICT 248%45%7%
DISTRICT 357%37%6%
QUESTION: What would make you more likely to vote for Democrats in the 2010 elections: If they pass health care reform that includes a public health insurance option but gets zero Republicans votes OR if they pass health care reform without a public option but with some Republican votes?
OPTIONGOP VOTESNOT SURE
ALL53%40%7%
MEN49%45%6%
WOMEN57%35%8%
DEMOCRATS89%8%3%
REPUBLICANS11%80%9%
INDEPENDENTS56%33%11%
WHITE47%46%7%
LATINO74%20%6%
BLACK81%12%7%
OBAMA VOTERS77%11%12%
It's been widely reported that as Senate Majority Leader, Harry Reid had well over a majority of the Senate committed to voting for a public health insurance option last year. But the public option was removed from consideration in an attempt to get a super-majority of 60 votes needed to overcome a Republican filibuster. Now, Senate Democrats will likely use a procedure called “reconciliation” – which only needs a simple majority – to pass the final elements of health care reform.
QUESTION: If Senate Democrats use “reconciliation” to pass the final elements of health care reform with a simple majority, should Harry Reid include a public health insurance option in the bill?
YESNONOT SURE
ALL52%41%7%
MEN47%45%8%
WOMEN57%37%6%
DEMOCRATS88%8%4%
REPUBLICANS8%82%10%
INDEPENDENTS58%33%9%
WHITE45%48%7%
LATINO78%16%6%
BLACK83%7%10%
OBAMA VOTERS73%16%11%
QUESTION: If the Senate passes a health care reform bill that you consider to be beneficial to your family, would you object to the Senate's use of “reconciliation” rules to pass that bill with a majority vote, or not?
NOYESNOT SURE
ALL55%36%9%
MEN51%40%9%
WOMEN59%32%9%
DEMOCRATS91%7%2%
REPUBLICANS10%74%16%
INDEPENDENTS64%23%13%
WHITE48%43%9%
LATINO81%11%8%
BLACK87%6%7%
OBAMA VOTERS77%10%13%

Tuesday, February 9, 2010

Health Care: Yes, We Can... Use Reconciliation?

So Nancy Pelosi is finally admitting the obvious in public.

House Speaker Pelosi's top healthcare adviser today outlined a plan that would allow both chambers to make changes to the Senate healthcare overhaul before the overhaul becomes law.

Wendell Primus said the plan is to have President Obama sign the Senate bill before signing the legislation making the changes, even though Congress will approve them in reverse to satisfy skeptical House members who refuse to pass the Senate bill before changes are made.

"The trick in all of this is that the president would have to sign the Senate bill first, then the reconciliation bill second, and the reconciliation bill would trump the Senate bill," Wendell Primus, told health policy experts gathered at the National Health Policy Conference hosted by AcademyHealth and Health Affairs.

So why wait any longer? Is Harry Reid paying attention? And more importantly, is President Obama paying attention?

A new WaPo poll shows that nearly 2/3 of Americans want health care reform done this year. So why not just get it done and get it done right?

By the way, another independent study shows that reconciliation can be used to pass health care reform. So yet again, why the wait? Get health care done, get it done right, and use reconciliation if necessary.

Thursday, January 28, 2010

The President, The State of the Union, & What Happens Next

So at last night's State of the Union speech, President Obama signaled he would not give up on comprehensive health care reform. Good. Our long-term economic viability depends on getting health care done soon and done right.

And again yesterday, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi signaled that the easiest way to get health care reform done is by the President, the House, and the Senate agreeing to two companion bills for passage: the Senate bill that passed last month and a companion bill done through reconciliation that fixes the problems in the Senate bill (like the excise tax and the "Nebraska & Louisiana Purchase"). It seems Obama may now be open to this, since he does want "the whole enchilada" done this year. However, it also seems Pelosi will need to win over Shelley Berkley and Dina Titus, and convince them that health care reform means long-term economic stability. And we'll need to convince all of them that the only way this health care reform can be trusted by most Americans is if it's complete with a public option for us to choose.

Another major announcement in last night's speech was President Obama's promise to "work to end 'Don't Ask Don't Tell'".

Abroad, America's greatest source of strength has always been our ideals. The same is true at home. We find unity in our incredible diversity, drawing on the promise enshrined in our Constitution: the notion that we are all created equal, that no matter who you are or what you look like, if you abide by the law you should be protected by it; that if you adhere to our common values you should be treated no different than anyone else.

We must continually renew this promise. My Administration has a Civil Rights Division that is once again prosecuting civil rights violations and employment discrimination. We finally strengthened our laws to protect against crimes driven by hate. This year, I will work with Congress and our military to finally repeal the law that denies gay Americans the right to serve the country they love because of who they are.

So will it actually happen this time? Will LGBTQ Americans be allowed to serve openly in the military once and for all? No one knows for sure, but at least we now have an opening to take action and get Congress to do something about it.

Later in the day, I'll have more thoughts on the SOTU speech, the fallout, and what happens next. This will be incredibly important, especially for us in Nevada. Harry Reid's political future depends on it. Dina Titus and Shelley Berkley will be critical for whatever next happens in the House. And of course, we progressives will need a game plan for holding the President's feet to the fire and making sure he delivers on all these promises.