Showing posts with label US House. Show all posts
Showing posts with label US House. Show all posts

Thursday, June 2, 2011

Why Nevada Matters (Again)

Now that the legislative session is wrapping up, we can get back to the other great pastime of Nevada: ELECTIONS! And believe it or not, we promise to be quite relevant again this next election cycle.

Last week, the head of the congressional Democrats’ campaign arm said he thinks his party can retake the House, and that the Silver State’s races could play a crucial role.

“This House is in play. I wasn’t prepared to say that before,” Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee Chairman Steve Israel told reporters last week, later telling the Sun that “based on the current climate, it looks like most of Nevada could be in play.”

As a swing state with a new congressional district and recently one of the tightest battlegrounds for the House, politicians in both parties are eyeing Nevada’s potential to deliver significant pickup.

If Democrats really mean to take the House in 2012, they’ll have to win 24 seats that are either vacant or under Republican control — three of which, potentially, could come from Nevada. But the national parties will be watching Nevada long before 2012.

So what does this mean? Basically, we can expect yet another banner year with big money, big ticket marquee races. The US Senate race is already being closely watched, as newly minted Senator Dean Heller (R-"Anointed") is having to learn the hard way that getting anointed/appointed to office doesn't make the following election a cake walk. But now that redistricting may very well end up in court, there's also now the possibility of as many as 3 competitive US House races forming here in Nevada next year.

In the mean time, however, there is already an exciting race happening with the NV-02 special election this year. The GOP frontrunners are all over the place on Paul Ryan's craptastic "Kill Medicare" plan, which in turn is causing major teabagger angst and another possible teabagger bid to blow up NV-02 for Republicans. Meanwhile on the Democratic side, Kate Marshall looks to be consolidating most party support and pouncing to take advantage of all the Republican division.

In addition to the personalities, the policies may also be playing a bigger role this year. Nevada still leads the country in unemployment and foreclosures, though recovery is now slowly starting to happen as everyone nervously awaits upcoming jobless reports, casino winnings, and sales tax receipts. However, the state is poised to take advantage of emerging opportunities in renewable energy and green technology, and debate continues on what kind of role we want state and federal government to play in encouraging this and creating more green collar jobs. And as hinted earlier, with Nevada's sizable and powerful senior communities becoming increasingly concerned about Congressional Republican plans to alter or dismantle Medicare, this will likely remain a major front-burner issue in this year's and next year's campaigns. In essence, the NV-02 special election this year may likely become an "idea lab" where party messages on top issues like Medicare, job creation, foreclosures, and climate change are first tested on a real electoral playing field. And next year, Nevada may again prove to be a national bellwether as voters' verdicts here may ultimately tip the balance of power on Capitol Hill.

And again, redistricting will probably become a major wild card. While a court drawn map might dash Democratic hopes of securing at least 2 safe House seats, on the other hand a court will likely deny Republicans ANY safe seats. With The Nevada Supreme Court poised to put aside partisan politics and draw a "fair map", there may be as many as 3 competitive House races next year... And 3 more seats Democrats can gain to move closer to the ultimate goal of 24 seats to flip to retake The House.

Sunday, March 21, 2010

BREAKING: HR 4872 HCR Reconciliation Fix Passes!

The vote is 217-205 right now, so we know it will pass. This is the reconciliation package that the House will send to the Senate. It nixes the "pork giveaways" in the Senate bill while strengthening some insurance regulations and increasing subsidies to help working families afford health insurance.

The final vote is 220-211. The bill is passed!

It's all up to our Harry Reid now to get the job done. I know he will. :-)

BREAKING: House Democrats Have (At Least) 216 Votes to Pass

It's pretty much confirmed. MSNBC just reported that infamous anti-choice holdout Bart Stupak will vote for the health care reform package, and he will urge the 6 other Reps remaining in "The Stupak Bloc" to do the same.

When Ohio Democrat and Stupak ally Marci Kaptur turned "Aye", things were really looking up. But now with Stupak on board, the health care bills today should pass with at least 216 votes.

Stay tuned here for more as I'll be watching the House all day today...

Monday, February 22, 2010

Health Care: Obama Drops Public Option... But We Can Still Bring It Back

OK, so the word is out. We have a plan from Mr. President. Ezra Klein (H/T TalkLeft) summarizes nicely how Obama's new plan will fix the Senate health care bill:

• Eliminating the Nebraska FMAP provision and providing significant additional Federal financing to all States for the expansion of Medicaid;
• Closing the Medicare prescription drug “donut hole” coverage gap;
• Strengthening the Senate bill’s provisions that make insurance affordable for individuals and families;
• Strengthening the provisions to fight fraud, waste, and abuse in Medicare and Medicaid;
• Increasing the threshold for the excise tax on the most expensive health plans from $23,000 for a family plan to $27,500 and starting it in 2018 for all plans;
• Improving insurance protections for consumers and creating a new Health Insurance Rate Authority to provide Federal assistance and oversight to States in conducting reviews of unreasonable rate increases and other unfair practices of insurance plans.


So do you notice something missing? I do. The New York Times does. The Huffington Post does.

Despite the recent surge of support in the Senate for a government-run health insurance option, President Obama chose not to include one of the most popular elements of reform in the plan he is presenting to a bipartisan group of lawmakers Thursday.

The Obama plan explicitly bridges the differences between Senate and House legislation on issues both large and small, but on the public option -- which is included in the House bill, but not in the Senate's -- Obama is entirely silent.


OK, so where do I begin? First off, I am glad Obama isn't giving up on health care. It needs to be done, it needs to be done this year, and it needs to be done ASAP.

It's good to see the provision blacking egregious insurance rate hikes in the proposal. That is absolutely necessary.

However, it sucks to see Obama leave out one of the most effective ways to rein in the HMO madness. Why no public option, Mr. President? It's been gaining momentum lately. At least 18 Senators have signed the pledge already to include it, Chuck Schumer is pushing to include it in the reconciliation package, and Harry Reid is ready to start the reconciliation process to pass it.

So why won't Obama advocate for it... Especially when Kathleen Sebelius said last week that the Administration would push for it if there was an opening in the Senate? Well, guess what? The opening is NOW!

But fear not, all is not lost. The public option is clearly not "dead".

Indeed, after months of watching Obama say generally that he supports the public option while doing little to see it implemented into law, backers of the idea were unsurprised it was left out of his final offer.

"We didn't expect one," said Darcy Burner, head of the Progressive Caucus Policy Foundation.

Last week's surge had fired up a demoralized Democratic base, giving the health care reform effort an extra push as Obama tried to drag it across the finish line. But if the final bill is to include a public option, leaders in Congress and outside organizations advocating on its behalf will need to do it without Obama. "Congress and the people of the United States will have to lead in truly taking on the insurance companies," Burner said.

Obama's decision not to push for the public option does not preclude it from being included. Indeed, any member of the Senate can introduce it as an amendment to a package moving through under the rules of reconciliation, a parliamentary process that precludes a filibuster.


So moving forward, we have a game plan. Get Congress to agree on passing the Senate health care bill with the reconciliation fix. Urge Democratic Congressional leaders to stay strong on the public option. Push Obama to push the public option. And hopefully, we'll end up with a good bill.

Friday, October 23, 2009

NV-03: Dina Delivers on Health Care & Public Option

Here's some great late breaking news from Open Left. The votes are being whipped among House Democrats for not just any public option, but a robust public option with a Medicare +5% reimbursement rate. Nancy Pelosi is counting, and fortunately it looks like we're really close to seeing a great health care bill passing the full House.

And better yet, I just called Dina Titus' DC office and confirmed it. She's on board!

So please call Dina's DC office at 202-225-3252 and/or her Henderson office at 702-387-4941 and thank her for standing up for real health care reform that works for Nevada's working families. Hopefully by next week, Pelosi will have enough votes to pass health care reform with a robust public option out of the House. And from there, it will all be on Senator Harry Reid...