tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3235679145814825223.post4037548260810965287..comments2024-03-27T20:19:17.048-07:00Comments on Nevada Progressive: (Not) Standing on Solid Groundatdnexthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18339904136472258194noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3235679145814825223.post-63412402676755982322012-04-02T13:20:33.678-07:002012-04-02T13:20:33.678-07:00Nevada has a high standard of justification in the...Nevada has a high standard of justification in the use of deadly force in self-defense. AB321 did not change or lower that standard. It has been case law since 1990 with no problems presented. AB321 only put the case law into our statues. Good work NV Legislature!<br /><br />NRS 200.130 Bare fear insufficient to justify killing; reasonable fear required. A bare fear of any of the offenses mentioned in NRS 200.120, to prevent which the homicide is alleged to have been committed, shall not be sufficient to justify the killing. It must appear that the circumstances were sufficient to excite the fears of a reasonable person and that the party killing really acted under the influence of those fears and not in a spirit of revenge.<br /> [1911 C&P § 130; RL § 6395; NCL § 10077]NVJJChttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08934902982859155356noreply@blogger.com